Bots Make Mockery of Traffic Statistics
50k of traffic - but nobody is home
Does bot abuse explain population growth and stagnant economy?
by Amazing4u, concerned citizen

Teeing up the Avro, Honi, and Enzo bot clans in a skybox over Liberty Central S
Just thought I'd drop you a line and a photo of so-called Bot abuse.
I went looking for a place to rent in a mall, and discovered a new mall with 50k traffic. I thought this was strange and went to investigate. Up high in the sky I found a skybox. Inside were about 30+ av's - all with very similar names. I took a pic which is included. After a while, word got out and people came to look - including several SL mentors.
Harold Mapholisto - the owner of the land - stopped by but he couldn't say much. Mr. Mapholisto owns part of the land at Liberty Central S (rented). Mapholisto then brought in an associate named Rocko Fallon who said that "his bots have been designed to manage up to 25 groups" and that "everyone of these bots are group managers". [it looks like the bot group managers are doing T-pose yoga together - maybe it is really an avatar exercise class? - the Editrix]
All the bots were created on the 14th march 2008. One of the SL mentors pointed out that LL terms of service states only 2 accounts to be created in 24 hour period. Some might consider this sort of bot abuse a deceptive practice, creating high traffic to entice shop owners take out rentals on the mall on ground level.
Can anyone trust people's traffic if this sort of thing happens?






LL will not address this issue and instead encourages deceptive criminal behavior.
And then they wonder why they have to eat DMCAs night and day rofl!
Best bet is if you observe this type activity then never go back and make sure anyone that will listen knows about it.
LL loves them false statistics don't they?
Before i opened a sim to the public i used some sleeks to test traffic measurement.
And the camping thing I bought never paid them lol!
I wonder how many legit camper folk get burned by camping things that are borked and never pay?
Posted by: Ann Otoole | March 23, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Oh please, does anyone even bother with traffic these days? Its been abused for so long about the only thing you can guarantee when you see high levels is either a load of bots or a load of campers, or both.
Posted by: Talwyn Mills | March 23, 2008 at 10:08 PM
Unfortunately this sort of thing is way, way too common.
The strange thing is that I'm pretty sure that by the letter of the TOS this practice is disallowed, yet it's been allowed to run rife for a long, long time. Are the Lindens more concerned with appeasing owners of commercial land than enforcing their own rules? I think we all know the answer to that!
Posted by: A concerned parent | March 24, 2008 at 03:24 AM
Anne prattles: "LL will not address this issue and instead encourages deceptive criminal behavior. And then they wonder why they have to eat DMCAs night and day rofl!"
What the fuck have DMCAs got to do with Camper Bots Anne? It's traffic gaming not copyright theft. Sheesh, you are loosing your sanity here. There is not a Brazilian under every bed ya know you silly old cow.
Posted by: Angel | March 24, 2008 at 04:33 AM
Traffic numbers have never been trustworthy.
On mainland, they dont add up cause they also count whomever zooms by on their way tot he other part of the continent, some malls and clubs cheat with it in other ways (like, a beachclub, mall and club on one single plot, combined traffic being counted and shown as mall traffic)
So if this worries you, dont let it. Cause you've been taking totally bogus numbers for real traffic sofar, so one bot more or less doenst matter. Your data's always been wrong.
If you wanna know if a mall is good to sell your products at, hang around for a bit and see for yourself, or ask someone about it who already has a vendor there, or just take your chances and go for it.
Also, word of mouth is powerful. If a mall is really good, you'll probably have heard others comment on it.
Posted by: Traffic's always been FAKE | March 24, 2008 at 07:04 AM
You've all missed the point by light years.
LL ignores the problem because the more bots they have, the higher the average number of users grows.
Posted by: Near | March 24, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Linden labs will never take action on this for several reasons.
1) It artificially inflates the 'number online' making Second Life look more popular than it really is. Additionally, since the bots don't move, don't IM, don't change clothes, and never teleport it makes the _average_ user experience look better than the reality. Since bots are usually non-physical they don't load the physics engine either. Furthermore, they are undoubtedly logged in with a light client like SLeek and make a very low bandwidth demand on the servers. Great for inflating claims of how many users a sim can support.
2) Linden Labs understands that land owners are _customers_ and customers pay the bills. As long as it's the _customers_ server space and the actions aren't hurting the grid at large why disallow the bots and risk alienating anyone? Now if someone were to park 25 bots in a competitors store LL might take interest. But challenge customers rights to do what they want on the servers they are leasing?
3) Does Linden Labs really care if traffic measurements are valid? Everyone who has more than a casual understanding of the Second Life economy is aware of the gaming of traffic measurements and the various workarounds to inflate the metric. Bots are just low cost campers and camping has been accepted for as long as it's been possible.
Stop a practice that improves your metrics, pleases your customers, and has negligible cost? Would that be a rational business decision?
Posted by: Ric Mollor | March 24, 2008 at 11:06 AM
One of the hardest things for me is finding a decent mall to set up my shops .... since traffic isn't a good indicator, I have to do exactly that .. ask other vendors or hang out in the mall for hours to see if there is "real" traffic or not
I have three shops with reliable income. My others are continually being closed and reopenned elsewhere after a few weeks with no, or little, sales.
Posted by: Just Me | March 24, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Easy solution....get rid of traffic numbers. What do people really care if someone uses bots to boost their traffic, I run a business and use a few(3-4) to boost my traffic and one of them also handles my group invites....who does this hurt? I hate the game of doing it, but how else do you compete with everyone else that is doing it? Yeah the noble answer is maybe be the better person, but when you are running a business you need to do what you have to do to survive and compete, and with the new search having traffic taken into account (or so I understand) you do what you have to do as long as it is legit and you think it is honest, and this is legit. The traffic numbers are a joke anyways, so I would really call this dishonest.
I do have a problem with the bot farm types with 30 or 40 bots, but hey thats their business and if it isn't hurting the end user experience with lag, whats it really matter? They are just using the system to get people to their shop, what business owner wouldn't want that?
Posted by: Kristoffer Juneau | March 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM
"Traffic's always been FAKE" makes a good point.Like real life, word of mouth is a good way to find out about places. Another way is to read the Second Life press (cough) because even if you hate it, at least the reviews of places demand that someone actually go along and see it, then tell folk a little about it. Herald lovers should feel free to look at... other publications. Herald haters should continue to read the Herald and complain about its imminent demise - while simultaneously checking out the content.
Oh, and I would include blogs as "media" within the SL community. Anyone with enough time to live in-world and also write a blog has to be taking SL a little seriously.
You might also want to check out MetaLife's MetaHUD system (use your search button to find it), which provides lists of popular places based on folks actually voting for them rather than simply TPing in and out, or sitting on camper chairs. The more folks who use the MetaHUD, the more accurate it will become.
Otherwise, just talk to people: They are your best source of places to see and things to do.
Posted by: Sigmund Leominster | March 24, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Group bots?!? LOL!
I have a group bot. And the only one I am aware of in SL (yes, I could be wrong here) is the JLA version -which causes the bot to sit and hover in a yoga fashion over an invisible prim.
But WTF - who gives a rip?
The more bots, the higher the traffic, but also the higher the lag and fewer 'slots' for real people to come shop.
When I look for a place to open business - if I see a club or campers anywhere in the vicinity - I don't even bother looking around and I'm off to the next potential mall.
Posted by: Ari | March 24, 2008 at 02:38 PM
I fail to see the big hooplah over this. So your faking traffic with bots. How is this any worse than paying noobs 2 tenths of a cent for 10 minutes do do the same thing for the same outcome?
Here is a simple way you can solve the problem:
EVERYONE USE THEM. soon you'll drive the traffic up so high everywhere LL will either terminate traffic or modify it to ignore bots or campers.
Now drop this topic. There's more shit on the carpet that needs to be scooped up be worrying about a couple of dust bunnies.
Posted by: Jim Schack | March 24, 2008 at 04:02 PM
"One of the SL mentors pointed out that LL terms of service states only 2 accounts to be created in 24 hour period."
Perhaps the Mentor can point out where this is stated in the ToS. Section 2.4 talks about the creation of multiple accounts, but doesn't mention a time restriction. Maybe this would be a good question to ask at the next GTeam Office Hours, Wednesday morning at 11:00 in the Kremer sim.
Posted by: GreenLantern Excelsior | March 24, 2008 at 04:49 PM
I admit to creating all of those bots. Yes, it was me! I did not do this to generate bogus traffic though. I did it because now that I am not the CEO, nobody talks to me. Talking to yourself is bad but talking to yourself in an alt doesnt mean I am crazy...just creative.
Posted by: Philip Linden | March 24, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Traffic stats are a joke.
The "one account per user" or paid 2nd account policy is never enforced. It's become a joke.
Stopping copy/clone bots has become a joke.
Customer service is a joke.
Anti-harassment policies are never enforced, becoming a joke.
SL itself is becoming a joke. But not a funny one.
Posted by: typical | March 24, 2008 at 05:25 PM
Well today I banned a campbot,that was in my store using a dancepad.Now some of the posters here are against camping,however without camping some people will not be able to buy anything,unless its a free item.Others use their L$,that they make from camping,to rent land,or houses.
So a good part of the SL economy,is from camping.What LL needs to do,is to track the ISP address,and find out how many come from one address.You can have up to 5 accounts,so if somebody has more than that,then they are breaking a TOS agreement.
Posted by: Frankie Antonioni | March 24, 2008 at 07:23 PM
@Typical - there is no one account per user and you cannot pay for an alt even if you want to. The policy changed a few months back, but its not in the TOS. If you try to create a sixth alt on the same email address or the 3rd alt within 24 hours, the system denies the account creation and gives a note about LL reserving the right to limit the amount of accounts an individual holds.
Posted by: Shirley Shipley | March 24, 2008 at 07:50 PM
Only 5 per e-mail address?
Give me 30 minutes, I"ll be back with 20 of them.
Posted by: typical | March 24, 2008 at 09:07 PM
"When I look for a place to open business - if I see a club or campers anywhere in the vicinity - I don't even bother looking around and I'm off to the next potential mall."
Yeah but clubs = traffic. REAL traffic. So I'd specifically go looking for malls near the big crowd gatherers if I were you, not avoid them alltogether.
Posted by: suggestion | March 25, 2008 at 06:40 AM
The bots are no worse than the fake prims to boost ratings and fake group members with picks. Even Bliss does it, using the new search, they have several listings on the first page and also on the classifieds next to it. Then check their item listings, about 300 fake prims to get that higher listing. This is supposed to be a "reputable" company. LMAO
Posted by: sick of it | March 25, 2008 at 07:56 AM
Ain't gunna buy from noone what runs bots to up their traffic! In fact, I'm gonna remotely nuke the hell out of them if'n I finds them. Yeah sure, they'll pop back but I'll do it again. Gunna sic the posse on em. Ain't playin with no system gamers! Mutha-fucks!
Posted by: Bot Keelers R Us | March 25, 2008 at 03:40 PM
I recently bought land in Lyralo, one of the new sims. I noticed a ton of traffic in the area of a shop selling little more than basic sculpties. Seeing that the traffic appeared to be above the shop, I threw on my MF and flew up to investigate. I found about fifty of these bots sitting in a builder's box above the shop. Apparently this set off warning bells, because the owner (Loni Arado, a name that sounds familiar to a controversial skin-trader) flew up to investigate my investigation. He explained in broken English that they were "his family". I didn't think to file an abuse report at that moment, but apparently someone did - or he got skittish - because they disappeared shortly thereafter and hasn't returned.
Posted by: Marx Dudek | March 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM
I think it's a pitty if this happens, But you cant stop it. Anyway for a Landlord it's almost not doable checking if people have bots. Which are campers and which are bots. also i think. I've seen many places with high traffic go down, Because when i shop and i see campers, I just don't shop there, u can notice right away it's not popular.
Posted by: Petar Ivanovic | March 27, 2008 at 04:36 PM
family..? LOL
Posted by: sn0wlady March | March 29, 2008 at 06:26 PM
"Yeah but clubs = traffic. REAL traffic."
I just went to the Beyond Good & Evil club, and they have an astonishing stock of about 40 bots in the sky to bolster their traffic.
Posted by: Quest Jarrico | March 30, 2008 at 01:52 PM
"I fail to see the big hooplah over this. So your faking traffic with bots. How is this any worse than paying noobs 2 tenths of a cent for 10 minutes do do the same thing for the same outcome?"
Well, first, believe me, I've always hated camping chairs and until bots came along, saw them as the sleaziest thing a landowner could do to boost their traffic. But compared to bots, campers are much better, at least to get campers to your sim, it involved a fair amount of advertising and business planning to get the sims name out and get people to come. Bots? You could have a private locked sim with no advertising become one of the top 10 most popular places in less than a week.
Now yeah, you might say that who cares it's meaningless now, but that's only to people like us who know about bots and camping and are jaded over the whole traffic system. New players however still buy into the farce until someone tells them about how the systems are gamed or until they figure it out themselves. So these people are getting undeserved business and undeserved attention with their undeserved traffic.
LL really should have taken out the entire traffic system a long time ago when it was first widespread gamed by camping places, but at least then there was a BIT of meaning because the camping places had to fight each other for campers and popularity, but now that it's entirely 100% raped and left in an alley to die sort of meaningless, I hope they'll reconsider and take the whole flawed broken system out.
Posted by: Quest Jarrico | March 30, 2008 at 02:21 PM